Compréhension écrite en anglais : AI-assisted grading – Entraînement IELTS

Objectif IELTS et concours : boostez votre niveau de compréhension écrite en anglais sur des sujets d’actualité.

Si vous préparez l’IELTS, le Bac d’anglais (ressources complètes) ou des concours, cet exercice de compréhension orale en anglais (reading comprehension) vous permettra de découvrir un sujet portant sur l’IA dans l’enseignement, sujet qui nous concerne tous ou presque, et de travailler ensuite la production écrite.

Let’s start !

🎯 Prêt(e)?
Image promoting reading comprehension resource titled 'AI-Assisted Grading' with a cartoon robot reading a book, flags of the UK, USA, and France in the background.

Compréhension écrite en anglais : AI-assisted grading – Entraînement IELTS

📝 Compréhension écrite : AI-assisted grading

Lisez le texte suivant puis répondez aux questions.

The Education Review

Special Report: AI in Schools MONDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2025 Weekly Edition

Grading by Algorithm: What is Lost When Robots Judge Our Children?

« Our students don’t write to impress a rubric—they write to be heard. » A warning from the frontlines of the digital classroom.

At a recent educational summit, a slide deck touted the « revolution » of the modern classroom. At the very top of the list of benefits sat a single word: Grading. The promise is seductive—AI can score hundreds of essays in mere seconds. But as we race toward efficiency, we must ask: at what cost to the human soul of writing?

Students today are more perceptive than we give them credit for. As one high schooler, Jane, aptly noted: « A bot has a rubric and benchmarks. But that is not what actually goes into writing. » Students recognize that while a machine can quantify data, it lacks the empathy to recognize growth, effort, or the fragile development of a unique voice. The danger is not technical capability, but the transformation of the audience from a mentor to a machine.

The Mirror Effect

The pedagogical risk is profound. If a student is graded by a robot, they learn that their audience does not truly matter. Another student, Wyatt, summarized the looming crisis of integrity: « If you can use AI to grade me, I can use AI to write. » When we reduce the act of writing—a deeply human endeavor—to a mechanical transaction of scores, we teach children that the only reason to write is for a grade. This is the definition of automated education.

Tech companies often market AI as a « time-saver » for overworked teachers. Yet, writing is a process, not just a product. While AI excels as a guide for brainstorming or suggesting metaphors during the early stages, it should never have the « last word » on a student’s score. When a teacher reads a poem a student wrote for a sick grandparent, they see beyond the grammar; they see the human relationship behind the words.

A Call for Intentionality

Caution must be our watchword. Some educators are successfully using AI-assisted platforms to provide rapid feedback during the revision process. In these cases, the AI serves as a mirror, helping the student refine their thoughts before a human eye ever sees them. This is « intentional » use—AI as an aide, not a judge.

Ultimately, when we hand over the red pen to an algorithm, we risk eroding a student’s belief that their words carry weight. We must not confuse efficiency with understanding, nor algorithms with empathy. Writing is, and must remain, a conversation between humans.

By Dennis Magliozzi & Kristina Peterson. Adapted from the University of New Hampshire’s Writers Academy.

📝 Exercises

1. Vocabulary in Context : Find the word or expression in the text that matches:

  • To quantify (v.): _________________
  • Overworked (adj.): _________________
  • Outsource (v.): _________________
  • Erode (v.): _________________

2. Deep Dive Questions

  • A. According to the students Wyatt and Jane, what is the main thing AI lacks when evaluating an essay?
  • B. Explain Wyatt’s logic: « If you can use AI to grade me, I can use AI to write. » What does this imply about student motivation?
  • C. What is the difference between using AI as a « guide » versus using it as a « judge »?
  • D. Why does the author mention a student writing a poem for a sick grandparent? What point does this illustrate?

Answers

👁️ Click to see the Correct Answers

1. Vocab: To quantify (measure), Overworked (too much work/exhausted), Outsource (delegate to an external source/tech), Erode (gradually destroy/wear away).

2.A. AI lacks empathy, the ability to recognize growth, effort, and the « human soul » of the writing.

2.B. It implies that if the evaluation process is dehumanized and mechanical, the student no longer feels the need to put human effort into the creation. Writing becomes a « bot-to-bot » transaction.

2.C. A guide helps with brainstorming or finding metaphors during the process. A judge delivers the final score, which should remain a human responsibility to maintain the student-teacher relationship.

2.D. It illustrates that writing often has an emotional purpose and a specific human audience. A bot can find « flaws » in the poem’s grammar, but it cannot understand why the poem matters.

💡

Vocabulary Memo : teachers, students and AI

  • A rubric : Une grille de critères (utilisée pour noter).
  • To tout : Vanter les mérites de quelque chose.
  • Outsourcing : L’externalisation (confier une tâche à une machine ou un tiers).
  • Benchmarks : Repères / points de référence.
  • Drafting / Revision : La phase de brouillon / la correction (relecture).
Essential terms for the digital classroom.

Production écrite en anglais

Voici un exercice de production écrite (writing) sur le thème que vous venez de découvrir. C’est un exercice type TASK 2 (tâche 2) de l’examen d’IELTS.

Faites l’exercice puis découvrez la réponse modèle que nous proposons (plus bas).

✍️ IELTS Writing Task 2: Education & AI

Pratiquez votre argumentation et l’usage des connecteurs logiques.

« Many educational institutions are starting to use Artificial Intelligence to grade student essays and provide feedback. Some believe this increases efficiency, while others fear it undermines the personal relationship between teacher and student. »

👉 Discuss both views and give your own opinion. (250 words minimum)

💡 Aide à la rédaction (Essay Structure)

Paragraph 1 Introduction: Paraphrase the prompt and introduce the debate between efficiency and empathy.
Paragraph 2 Benefits of AI: Instant feedback, objective scoring (rubrics), and reducing teacher burnout.
Paragraph 3 Risks of AI: Loss of human connection, inability to recognize effort/voice, and « automated education » concerns.
Paragraph 4 Conclusion: State your opinion (e.g., AI as an aide for drafting, but humans for final judgment).

🔗 Vocabulaire & Connecteurs clés :

Objective evaluation To devalue craft In contrast From a pedagogical standpoint Ultimately

📖 Model Answer: The AI Grading Debate

Exemple de réponse structurée pour obtenir un score élevé à l’IELTS.

👁️ Cliquez ici pour lire la réponse modèle

The integration of Artificial Intelligence into the educational sector has sparked a heated debate, particularly regarding its role in evaluating student work. While the use of AI for grading offers significant improvements in efficiency and objectivity, it also raises concerns about the potential loss of the human element in learning.

Proponents of AI grading argue that it provides instantaneous feedback, which is crucial for a student’s immediate improvement. Unlike overworked teachers who may take weeks to return an essay, a bot can process work in seconds. Furthermore, AI is perceived as being perfectly objective; it follows a predefined rubric without the subconscious biases or fatigue that can affect a human grader. This ensures that every student is judged solely on the benchmarks provided.

On the other hand, many educators fear that « automated education » devalues the unique voice of the student. Writing is not merely a mechanical task but a human act of communication. An algorithm can quantify grammar and structure, but it lacks the empathy to recognize a student’s personal growth or the emotional weight of their arguments. Consequently, if students feel they are writing for a machine rather than a human mentor, they may lose the motivation to express their true selves, leading to a culture where they write to « satisfy the bot » rather than to be heard.

In my opinion, AI should be utilized as a pedagogical aide rather than a final judge. It is an excellent tool for the drafting and revision phases, allowing students to refine their work before submission. Ultimately, however, the final grade and the relationship behind it must remain a human responsibility to ensure that education remains a meaningful dialogue.

💡 Vocabulary Check (C1/C2 Level)

Notez l’usage de : « Subconscious biases » (préjugés inconscients), « Predefined » (prédéfini), « Instantaneous » (instantané) et « Devalue » (dévaluer).

Et si vous passiez à la vitesse supérieure ?

Cours d’anglais & préparation TOEIC – IELTS – TOEFL – Cambridge

Transformez ces mots en véritables compétences en anglais !

Nos cours d’anglais sur mesure vous aident à le convertir en résultats concrets pour le TOEIC, l’IELTS, le TOEFL et les examens Cambridge, avec un accompagnement pas à pas.

✔️ Professeurs natifs
✔️ Préparation TOEIC / IELTS / TOEFL / Cambridge
✔️ Plan personnalisé selon votre objectif
✔️ Coaching stratégie d’examen & timing
BOOSTER MON NIVEAU D’ANGLAIS 🚀

Message prérempli : vous n’avez plus qu’à cliquer et envoyer. Réponse garantie sous 24h à 48h.

Objectif score TOEIC – IELTS – TOEFL – Cambridge
Accompagnement sur mesure

Ces leçons pourraient aussi vous intéresser :

Révisez vos examens et concours en anglais avec l’un de nos super profs

Retour

Votre message a été envoyé

Attention
Attention
Attention
Attention.


En savoir plus sur Polyglottes

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Laisser un commentaire